By Jordan Zakarin (https://www.thewrap.com/net-neutrality-matters-much-indie-filmmakers/)
Consumer
groups and tech advocates have been voicing concern about the growing
threats to net neutrality, but Hollywood — especially independent
filmmakers and distributors — have plenty of reason to worry about the
walls and toll booths being erected to discriminate between internet
content.
“If we want to directly sell movies off our site, like
Louis CK does, the challenges that I then have is, what price do I have
to pay to make sure that my information is delivered at the speed and is
as high quality as it can be?” Ted Hope, a veteran indie film producer (“21 Grams,” “Adventureland”) who now runs the independent distributor Fandor, told TheWrap.
“To get information faster, big pocketed entities like Netflix go and
make deals with Comcast, but small companies don’t have that option.”
Fandor operates on a revenue-splitting model, allowing
filmmakers to sell their work directly to consumers by using the site as
a platform. It is one of many services that operates in this sort of
fashion; an ever-growing list also includes Vimeo, Joost, Indiefix and
even large companies like Hulu, which has not struck a deal similar to
that which Netflix grudgingly made with Comcast.
Platforms, in this case, could either ultimately be forced to pay for
special access to the pipes — and thus pass along the cost to either
the consumer or the filmmaker — or fall behind.
“The independents are now looking at the smaller companies
who are competing not only with Comcast, but also with Netflix, and
don’t have the money to pay for preferred carriage, and are not going to
pay for co-located interconnection,” Jean Prewitt, the CEO and
President of the Independent Film and Television Alliance (IFTA), told
TheWrap. “And those are increasingly going to be the services that a lot
of our members are going to be looking to as their way onto the
internet. Or, our members are looking themselves to put forward their
own service in which they aggregate content of a particular genre or
type and try to put forward.”
In theory, having just a handful of content distributors
equipped with the fastest connections could be okay for independent
filmmakers, but monopolization and market share have already constricted
the free flow of movies, and that would only get worse. The struggle of
independent distributors and platforms is intimately connected with the
fate of independent filmmakers because outlets like Netflix and iTunes
(which may also reach a deal with Comcast),
as well as the cable companies’ own VOD offerings, are so tightly
curated. This, even before the courts struck down the FCC’s Net
Neutrality principles in January.
“If you do not have films that have been theatrically
released in the United States, or have a very strong, quite obvious
niche audience, it’s very difficult to get on the major VOD services,”
Prewitt said. “That’s true for a couple of reasons, but it’s complicated
by the fact that none of the big services really are putting out there
unlimited capacity.”
The fact that distributors and platforms don’t release their VOD profits only adds to the problem, as it’s hard to tell which movie is a surprise hit and discourages discovery.
The potential merger of Comcast and Time Warner Cable could
only serve to exacerbate that problem. The IFTA, which is on the record
as pro-open internet, hasn’t released an official position on that
pending marriage, but is wary of its potential consequences.
“Increasingly independents have to go through one or more
levels of aggregator, because no one coming down the line, starting at a
Comcast, Time Warner or Fox, wants to deal with a company that only has
one or two films to offer at a time,” Prewitt said. “So they say go
find someone else to package that together, and in many cases that’s In
Demand, which is commonly owned. In Demand chooses what it wants to put
forward, and that’s not everything, and In Demand won’t deal with
smaller distributors, so you have to go to another aggregator. And every
one of those layers leads to cherry picking, costs and delay.”
Simply put: If you weren’t in theaters or don’t have a
star, you’ve got way less of a shot of getting of one of the big VOD
systems. And if broadband providers price smaller VOD systems out of
business or at least put them at a technical disadvantage, you’re either
out of luck getting distribution — or paying a bigger share of your
profit to one of the big name platforms if they do happen to accept your
film.
“I care about net neutrality because I’ve got to try to get
my movies out in a good way, any way I can,” Daniela Taplin Lundberg, a
veteran indie producer (“The Kids Are All Right”)
and partner at Red Crown Productions, said. “I want audiences to be
viewing the content that I’ve slaved over through any platform. Whether
that’s Hulu, YouTube, Netflix, iTunes, I want them to be able to view it
in the same way, with the best quality. That being said, that doesn’t
feel the way the tide is turning.”
At the moment, Lundberg says, the uncertainty around which VOD services will carry her films — and the financial boom or bust that will cause — doesn’t have much impact on many of the projects she chooses to produce, especially micro-budget features; you can only shave a budget down so far.
But, with pre-sales on distribution making up quite a bit of a film’s financing these days, and theaters showing fewer and fewer independent films, there’s more pressure on VOD. If there’s no guarantee that a movie will make it onto a VOD system, no one will want to buy its home entertainment rights — and that means a film just may not get made in the first place.
No comments:
Post a Comment